Volume 25, Issue 2 (July 2018)
J Birjand Univ Med Sci. 2018, 25(2): 124-131 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tabatabaei S M A, Kazemi H, Javidi M, Zarei M, Hosseini Zarch S H, Goldani Moghadam M. Comparison of diagnostic efficacy of conventional radiography, digital radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in apical root resorptions. Journals of Birjand University of Medical Sciences 2018; 25 (2) :124-131
URL: http://journal.bums.ac.ir/article-1-2373-en.html
URL: http://journal.bums.ac.ir/article-1-2373-en.html
Seyyed Mohammad Ali Tabatabaei1 
, Hanie Kazemi2 , Maryam Javidi3 , Mina Zarei4 , Seyyed Hossein Hosseini Zarch5 , Mahdjoube Goldani Moghadam * 6
, Hanie Kazemi2 , Maryam Javidi3 , Mina Zarei4 , Seyyed Hossein Hosseini Zarch5 , Mahdjoube Goldani Moghadam * 6
1- Assistant Professor of Periodontics, Faculty of dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
2- Undergraduate student of Dentistry, Faculty of dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
3- Associate Professor of Endodontics, Dental Material Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
4- Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Dental Material Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5- Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Radiology, faculty of dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
6- Assistant Professor of orthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran. ,mahdjoube.gm@gmail.com
2- Undergraduate student of Dentistry, Faculty of dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
3- Associate Professor of Endodontics, Dental Material Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
4- Assistant Professor of Endodontics, Dental Material Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
5- Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Radiology, faculty of dentistry, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
6- Assistant Professor of orthodontics, faculty of dentistry, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran. ,
Abstract: (7740 Views)
Background and Aim: Since the external root resorption is not detectable clinically, therefore radiographic examination is very important for diagnose, Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic efficiency of conventional, digital and CBCT radiography in detecting of external root resorption.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, after radiographic and clinical examination, 20 single-rooted human premolar teeth without calcification and resorption were selected. Cavities were drilled 0.8 mm in diameter with round burs 08 in one-third of the cervical, mid, and apical of the buccal wall, digital and CBCT images were taken. The images were evaluated by 3 faculty members of Mashhad Dental School. The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS V.18 software and Chi-Square test. The significance level was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The ability to detect external resorption by CBCT was significantly higher than the other two methods (P=0.000). However, there was no significant difference between conventional and digital radiography. External resorption in the coronal, middle and apical were 78.7%, 62.3%, and 35.5%, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the results, CBCT seems to be more reliable in determining external root resorption, in areas of maxillofacial superimposition, and in one-third of the apical root.
Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytic study, after radiographic and clinical examination, 20 single-rooted human premolar teeth without calcification and resorption were selected. Cavities were drilled 0.8 mm in diameter with round burs 08 in one-third of the cervical, mid, and apical of the buccal wall, digital and CBCT images were taken. The images were evaluated by 3 faculty members of Mashhad Dental School. The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS V.18 software and Chi-Square test. The significance level was considered to be 0.05.
Results: The ability to detect external resorption by CBCT was significantly higher than the other two methods (P=0.000). However, there was no significant difference between conventional and digital radiography. External resorption in the coronal, middle and apical were 78.7%, 62.3%, and 35.5%, respectively.
Conclusion: According to the results, CBCT seems to be more reliable in determining external root resorption, in areas of maxillofacial superimposition, and in one-third of the apical root.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Dentistry
Received: 2017/11/20 | Accepted: 2018/06/30 | ePublished ahead of print: 2018/06/30 | ePublished: 2018/06/30
Received: 2017/11/20 | Accepted: 2018/06/30 | ePublished ahead of print: 2018/06/30 | ePublished: 2018/06/30
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Attribution-NoneCommercial CC BY-NC